![]() |
|
Greetings! |
Religion Discussions on religions, mysticism, and spirituality as well as opposing views such as agnosticism and atheism. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
the rest of the universe
why did god create the rest of the universe? like the stars that we would have to travel many times faster than the speed of light to get to. seems like a pointless thing for god to do
|
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No more pointless than the act of building a theater 12 billion years before the play you've written begins.
Yes, the ways of the Lord are truly mysterious indeed... and often times, it would seem, pointless, as well. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
During the original concept of god the people knew nothing of light years or galaxies or gravity. They wrote into words only that which they knew in order to create the laws of their god. It made sense a long long time ago.
Religion already has it's hands full trying to refute or blend in all types of accurate scientific information that completely contradicts their teachings. It is just going to get worse for them. The comment "The ways of the lord are mysterious" points to the fact that if the dogma don't fit just get mysterious. I think people are getting smarter and realizing religious doctrine makes little sense when compared to known fact. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Why do I know the answer is "no"? I know it because he said Man would have to travel "many times faster than the speed of light" to get to much of the rest of the universe. Our "current understanding" holds that this kind of speed is impossible to obtain. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Nothing can "travel" faster than the speed of light in any medium. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You misunderstand the difference between travel, speed, and distance.
Quote:
The science fiction of today may be tomorrow's science fact... which is why I said, "current understanding". Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What is it to truly know something? How do you know anything to be completely true? How can the theories of scientists about the past, which no one has seen, be taken as an absolute truth when no one knows what happened? The one fact that we all know is that we are alive, who can dispute this? Unless, of course, you are a Creation Scientist, then you believe that we are not really here at all. Today's accurate scientific information is tomorrow's absolute hogwash, the theories change so much and so quickly that even what is accurate could be way off the mark.
__________________
“…for the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.” Robert Jastrow
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
[quote=jpie]why did god create the rest of the universe? like the stars that we would have to travel many times faster than the speed of light to get to. seems like a pointless thing for god to do[/QUOTE
jpie, why must everything revolve around the human race. Human's are not even the most interesting or unique of the creatures here on earth. Mayhaps GOD, has created many other such entity's spread out over a vast expanse, and just maybe finding each other would be a simple thrill for GOD. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here's a link to the only article I read (so far, and laughed at) http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp about Dinosaurs and the bible. They obviously have no clue about the dating process and in some cases it appears they are out right lying.
__________________
"The irrationality of a thing is no argument against its existence, rather a condition of it." -Nietzsche The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad. -Nietzsche Art raises its head where creeds relax. -Nietzsche |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Compare and contrast with superstition, blockheadedness, idiocy, and cretinism. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
In normal space, the speed of light is the limit. That limit can not be broken because as one's speed increases, time slows down to the point of time standing still if we ever reach this speed. Also, mass increases as speed increases. Therefore, If we actually reach the speed of light, then: 1. Time stands still and we don't go anywhere. 2. We become infinetly massive. The only way for us to travel faster than light is to somehow bend space or travel in a medium outside of normal space. Then, by the fact that we are covering more ground at a lower speed, the percieved speed based on the time taken and our starting/destination points may seem to be faster than the speed of light by traveling slower than the speed of light.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
[quote=Fletcher]
Quote:
Fletcher's view is a view that I also share, just haven't posted it here before. If we ever meet other races, then we can meld our views with theirs and get a better picture of the overall scheme of things.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Granularity
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yogic Metaphysics and Holographic Dreams in Maya | Mike Dubbeld | General Philosophy | 5 | 05-23-2010 08:15 PM |
The Paradox Of Nothingness And The Case For The New Deism | AlumnodeVerum | Religion | 17 | 08-01-2007 12:35 AM |
God and the Universe (madesta and Anil) | Mike Dubbeld | Religion | 0 | 12-19-2006 04:42 AM |
The Dangers of Creation | ku | Religion | 206 | 03-18-2006 04:38 AM |
A new view for the universe | nwaogu | General Science and Nature | 15 | 03-10-2006 06:45 AM |