Time and space

[kyman]

http://www.astraldynamics.com/tutori...BulletinID=236

This entire site has tons of interesting information.

[Bitterduck]

This link talks more about the derivation of F=ma, the impossible possible.

http://www.calphysics.org/inertia.html

and http://www.science-spirit.org/printe...article_id=126

[IamJoseph]

Is time in space or space in time?

[eiselg]

Originally Posted by IamJoseph

Is time in space or space in time?

They are both time at the basic level flows continuously or we couldn't have the world we have...it wouldn't work mathematically. Just because time is linear doesn't mean you can't make it behave as though it has 3-dimensions, time and distance...it can be done by grouping sequences. A time-line is more than just a line it has an infinite number of time-locations and everything can be coded in this.

[IamJoseph]

Originally Posted by eiselg

They are both time at the basic level flows continuously or we couldn't have the world we have...it wouldn't work mathematically.

Yes, these are simultainious phenomenons, and intergrated. Of coz the uni would'nt be the same without it. But that the maths would'nt work is a problematic item for me: one has to determine whether the universe is a reflection of the maths, or is it the other way around - that the maths account for the way the universe operates.

Here, the maths clearly accounts for the structures which exist, but this is after the fact: there is no evidence of maths independently, because the periods of a pregnancy and an egg boiling, for example, appear to be operating independently or following a dictate far removed from the maths, and the maths represent its reflection and accounting only. The egg does not take 3 minutes because this is dictated by maths. Siting the micro values of the egg in particle mode, the normal response, fails here: the egg is a variant of the generic attributes in the micro realm, and accounts for a new entity from it, which appears later and far removed.

Eg: you decide to build a bridge to carry a 1000 cars. Then you work out the correct maths required for it: here, the thought of the bridge precedes any maths. Its alternative says, there was existing maths - then the bridge happened - regardless of your input. Although one can say the bridge could not be built the same way without the maths - it is still a situation the maths is a component tool [like nuts and bolts], and an after thought provision.

But IMHO, the correct sound premise here is resultant by a thought or design - because the maths and the universe allign with each other, with a display of recognised intergration, and is subservient to the design and thought [it becomes a utility]. This says, there must be a hovering treshold here, one that can control and transcend both the maths and the universe, and in a non-random mode. Random and intergration are contradicting, mutually exclusive premises. A car key and the car cannot be random if they are intergrated.

Q: What can be the cause of this intergration from a scientific view - specially if time and space are seen as alligned and respective to each other? This is one of the pivotal questions confronting the mechanics of the universe.

[kyman]

Yes.

[IamJoseph]

Originally Posted by kyman

Yes.

I agree. Both were created simultainiously, both recognise each other, both are vested this side of the universe. The odds that time predated space, but space just accidently responds to complex equations based on time - is unscientific.

The unit of time required for a pregnancy, or the earth's orbiting of the sun, is not an accident or random: this signifies that time is pre-designed to respond to space; and vice versa.

[Bachial]

There is plenty of space in these forums.... (see below)


























but people don't seem to have the TIME to leave longer posts...

[*Yawn*...God?]

Did I mention that I'm really Bachial?

[IamJoseph]

Originally Posted by *Yawn*...God?

Did I mention that I'm really Bachial?

Let Bachial say so. Did I mention I don't buy retail but want it sraight from the Manufacturer - as at Sinai?

[Bachial]

Originally Posted by IamJoseph

Let Bachial say so. Did I mention I don't buy retail but want it sraight from the Manufacturer - as at Sinai?

I am Y's intelligent alter ego; his intuition and poetry; I am at war with the darkness of the other side, his dark tortured and torturing side. I will prevail.

[IamJoseph]

Originally Posted by Bachial

I am Y's intelligent alter ego; his intuition and poetry; I am at war with the darkness of the other side, his dark tortured and torturing side. I will prevail.

Now really confused. There is no darkness on the other side - who said so?

[eiselg]

The article shows that scientists are trying to answer the questions I am asking. I certainly agree that matter is an allusion, everything is made of waves such as light. In fact light is made of smaller wave particles called quantum that when added together make light of different frequency or wave length. The zero point field is interesting, but doesn't explain why we have 3 basic dimension to choose from. This missing fact is essential to any theory...if we knew how the three-dimensions are contrived we would have more to work with.

I know the zero-point field must exist because of the experiments and the field must consist of basic wave particle [+ and - pressure and vacuum] that makes everything. The problem I have is with mass...I believe it is part of an ether chain of quantum leaps; mass was talked about in the paper given. Quantum time-leaps cannot occupy the same position in time, however, chain identity transfers can occupy one unit from its chronological partner. In my universal chain loop system in-line identity transfers around the loop can freeze the shape of the path. If the second cycle is one unit from the first cycle the path becomes dynamic unless time-leaps are to close together and there is a local freeze in time.

Conditions in a stepped path in [x-y-z] directions of chronological time-leaps results in the speed of light. The greater the concentration of chronological time-leaps the more freezing of the segment of the path. The movement of light in in three crossed chain wave particle components.

Chronological time-leaps are the best way to explain mass. To move something you must try to have something occupy the same space, this means that it and the occuper must try to relocate in opposite directions. The one with the most mass will move the least.

[Bitterduck]

everything is made of waves such as light....except for the things that are not.

[Juntao]

And the things that are not, are made of anti-waves such as darkness.