And? Most people pick a vehicle based on what they like, instead of what some pretensious, pompous, prick thinks they should. I mean should someone put a gun to my head and tell me by a "fuel effecient" vehicle or die? It's my money. I mean do I need to provide documentation on why I should be allowed to drive a pick up? Hell what if I just like the way an F150 looks. Hell I bet every man in this forum drives a vehicle that he doesn't perceive as feminen.
It is curious that inanimate objects can have feminine or masculine qualities. It takes a very insecure man to attribute non-existent qualities to an object. Apparently there are many of these men in the U.S.; in other places too, but especially in the U.S. There's nothing wrong with driving a pick-up truck, if you need to drive a pick-up truck. If you don't need to drive it, and you do drive it anyway, you're effectively being irresponsible. Now, that's not a crime, but it is still irresponsible. I wonder: Do straight, butch men think that women invented the Prius? That women invented diesel-electric motors? That women invented hybrid vehicles? That women invented solar cars? That women discovered the photoelectric effect? The ridiculously vast majority of the shit you use, and a lot of the shit perceived as "feminine" were invented by men. Are they all homosexuals? Do they all take it in the ass? Or suck dick? This *especially* American idea of what is masculine and feminine is very unfortunate and kind of sad. And it is because of this perceived weakness of associating an inanimate object with gender qualities that makes America the rather stagnant nation it is in many social aspects. You can't get any more "feminine" than Apple. iPod? iPad? MacBook? Smooth, white, curves, not black, hard-edge, rough? The symbol of the company is an Apple? A...*fruit*? Yet many men (possibly all faggots) use Apple products. Was Steve Jobs a homosexual? Are all Apple users homosexuals? This...is silly. And for the record, I would rather own this than this
Mhm. Would you drive any of the following? And you are claiming irresponsibility on those who drive pick up trucks when they "don't need them?" When the hell did it become anyone elses buisness to pick other people's vehicle? Have you seen South Park? This is what the left ends up looking like to people like me because of this self righteous BS. [youtube]NzQBz3h5gnc[/youtube] [youtube]K6hlUF4h-ZY[/youtube] Yea sure it is maybe a little coarse, but it is certainly realistic on how a lot of us see this kind of crap.
I live a Tardy Life Time And Relative Dimension In Space Just think for a minute you are never late In every possible position in time and space Your only problem is that upon getting out Their is the probability a Dalek will try to nail you. PEaCe
No, Boeing will do what current technology allows. I am not aware of any aircraft built of stainless steel. Way too heavy. The most used material today is high-strength aluminum. The aircraft industry began experimenting with carbon fiber composites in the 1960's. Lockheed's C-5A had large leading edge panels made of carbon fiber. Amazing stuff. Strength-to-weight ratios are almost unbelievable. The weight of a full size 6-passenger sedan made of carbon fiber, excluding engine and fuel, would be low enough for an average man to pick up the car and walk away with it. I want to assume they have worked out the brittlenes problems. Ask any plastic Corvette owner what happens in a crash. The other major concern (survivability in a crash is primary) is the quality of the ride. In automobiles, ride comfort is a function of the ratio of sprung weight to unsprung weight. The thing to get really excited about would be if they developed a wheel/tire system of comparable light weight. I also want to believe they have solved vibration and flutter problems in the aircraft. All planes have the problem to some degree. An extremely light aircraft should be more sensitive. Less weight means less momentum. Bottom line - relative to the original question - is that my big SUV and I are going to come out much better than you and your plastic toy car in a crash. Untill they get all the crazy drivers who seem to be intent on killing people in crashes off the road, I'll drive something big and heavy. I consider the cost of the extra fuel used as an insurance expense and well worth it.
Yes. Especially the Mini. Ahh, you see, it's up to the informed individual to choose the most adequate and correct vehicle for himself. Unfortunately, when a large portion of a population is stupid, and form a collective of ignorant, uninformed individuals, they tend to make the wrong choices. I watch South Park. I listened to that video. Unfortunately, as self-righteous as those fart-smellers are, those corp. execs. that fly on private jets and have a hybrid vehicle for show are, the South Park guys, Stone and Parker, are wrong, from a philosophical perspective, and especially wrong from a scientific one. They're fucking comics, comedians. Firstly, they're speaking of L.A. specifically. Americans tend to have a "We're the center of the Universe" mentality, and no greater is that than in Los Angeles. And not only of L.A., but wealthy L.A. persons. "Most people in L.A. drive hybrid cars and then go and get private jets to go where they need to go...." What did that dumb fuck say? Most people in L.A. take private jets? How many million live in L.A.? Most take private jets? And if he didn't mean this statement, why did he say it? I know why; because he was impassioned because of his hatred that mind-blocked him and he said something so hyperbolic as to be embarrassingly stupid. Their fucking gripe was against rich persons that use hybrids as a statement, but unfortunately they take their gripe against an inanimate object that is objectively more fuel efficient and more ecological than an SUV, because they end up discouraging others from buying a hybrid because it would inherently make them be dicks, which is, I suppose, freedom of speech, if not stupid, childish and rather bitter speech. Millionaires getting pissed at multimillionaires. To paraphrase what they later said: "You know, it's cool to have a hybrid, you save gas, it's good, as long as you're not a dick about it." Since when did humans ever stop being dicks? Half their fucking episodes are about someone or some group they consider dicks. Such pussies that have their panties in a bunch. Unfortunately, the fart smellers are right; they do know better, and that's is why they're self-rightous about it. If they didn't have to know better, i.e. if the rest of the population weren't stupid, ignorant fucktards, they wouldn't be smug because it would be common, and there'd be nothing to be smug about since it would be the norm. But unfortunately, idiots exist, and so they have the ability to be smug about it. And Parker and Stone should blame themselves for the continued smugness, since that episode only makes the gap between the smug hybrid owner and the idiot SVU owner (that doesn't need it, like every rapper, banker, entertainer (Park and Stone included: why the fuck do they need an SUV? Are they hauling grain from the mill down to market?) even greater.
I happened to know this. Lolno regarding the last sentence. Can you ask for me? I'm curious as to what they say. That would depend on the type of plastic, eh? After all, what are plastics but polymers?
Staff of life is water. Words identify, movements like (Insert any name) ism, subjects (insert any name) ists/ist and objects (insert any name) like, knife, fork, spoon and plate in kitchen-ism . That is a member of any movement, national, language, familiar or tongue. Is identifies the attributes contained within that person, the group they claim ownership of and the policies they act on as their code of honour thus keep the groups integrity wholesome and forthright around the dinner table. kitche kitche koo dear children. ABBA DADDA DOO! Whoops I think I ate the kitchen sink and had the tea towel for desert. [youtube]TS9_ipu9GKw[/youtube] Matter= staff over life, judge=l ife over staff, people= members who love others as they love themselves. People who matter judge. people who judge matter. Please forgive me for eternity for inverting Kevin's proverb. Greater love has no man than to give up his life for others. On inversion of a proverbial utterance's error is soon detected. Staff of Life is that each member of the set of people is formed from the inside out. Evidence that supports this statement is all around all, all of the time simply by being. Be/Do x Do/Be = One with our creator. By removal of "THE NOT STATEMENT" the expression is brought into sharp contrast. Since a vote is a vow then to vote for any governmental arrangement than the "KINGDOM OF GOD" is an apostacy/treason/punishment. Judge not that you not be judged. Material we are formed from is HOLY SPIRIT is light is all study of material world as has been revealed via science the study of the world external to all conscientiosness. People who judge do not matter. People who matter do not judge Please explain why then the world is the exact opposite to that? Put yourself in the witness stand before judge and jury who sit at the King's command, YOU stuck between attorney for the prosecution of your claims and the attorney for the defence of your claims. People who judge matter. People who matter judge. To LIKE or NOT LIKE is to JUDGE. When one likes/loves or not likes/loves one judges. Please explain? 7:41 AM 13/10/2011 I Leica my camera's bright line viewer that shows what is in and out of my picture. My 1975 M4p, made in Canada has fallen into many pieces at the bottom of my camera case. My Leica V-LUX 1, all I could afford got stolen probably by a friend I made of a street person. My Lumix GI has Leitz's lenses made under licence using Leitz lens test equipment. Modulation Tranfer Function curves mean I can point my lens at a light source with minimal coma distortions. Sparkles on the water beat Nikon's and Cannon's every time especially when wide open. A picture made of my experiences with my like of leica's light, dawn's light as drawn with words. 8:47 AM 13/10/2011 A point is a volume of information is a pointer too, now, I have forgotten the name given to those lines of people who follow the leader around the floor to the tune of some ancient music the melody of which can no longer be remembered, yet have heard and seen it countless times before, ah then congo line comes to mind, if so then, why does my liitle eye and me, think of joseph conrad's novella, heart of darkness and elephants ivory tusks tearing though a market full of fragile goods to love the smell of napalm in the morning, of francis ford coppola's interpretation of the war in vietnam, i hear the music in my head and it aches for the memory of it's name..........love that elephant within the boundaries of this pictured sailient view, forgetful, forgiven, forsaken, where he went worn out by the bride all fat and wide, slipping on banana skins and falling to the side, after photo-journalistic pictures staked their claim to be this popular fashion after the bubbles of champagne flowed from the MAGNUM PHOTO AGENCY? Think about it luv peat P.S.tink tink tink...rattle the bullett points on my kevlar vest. 9:29 AM 13/10/2011 I smoked it, I inhaled it, saw between the lines a fiction as friction's fractal, factual, displacement of academic Archimedian proportions. Found a place of forms, from which no one has ever return-ed after imbibing of the belladonna's, ancient angel trumpet flower. I admit it, did Bill Clinton or any one of a large number of politicians, legislators or communicators? Would they be game enough to ask their creator, is it pot or poppies or coco or birch trees substances as extracted by pharmaceutical companies with the help of chemists who have been gifted with the right to deliver a doctor's prescriptive advice under the auspices of that phenomena called the legislated rule of law beneath the constitution of that nation, that any who, upon denial or rebellion faces retribution via common statute law framed beneath that self same constitution in each and every land to find, it is not so while each nation, tribe, family and tongue hold different codes of honour, moral or morale, puts its members to death or hard labor or jail, has any one of you ever bothered to of ever ask-ed, what does all of that means to him as it's maker? That is the position, is the time of grace ended and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil now known and if so where is the tree of life? I note with interest that too much or too little of any food is deadly. History proved to be glut or famine, peace or war, stuck between heavens sunshine and earth's gravitas with you and seven billion stories like yours that really do matter to a loving creator who claims he loves us and we reproved every instant we get to live. 10:32 AM 13/10/2011 Habits entail an all consuming passion for fashions via industry. What I call fashionable others may call abominable and vice versa. I.E. you will find a button that says "like" beneath this post. To not click it means that you do not like that which was said or do not know or remain neutral too it and to comment, perhaps a request for more information to help you to decide on the best course of action, the one you like, like a judge at a Camera Club Event. Stan and I had a discussion the other day on that subject. If I remember it correctly it was over a principle applied where to say nothing implied guilt? Kind means like to naming convention techno-crats. Please take your time and consider that which follows. Tree is an object when planted and grown from a seed, to seed after flowering and fruiting. Tree is a subject when considered as all the atomic combinations that scientifically compose it of things invisible to the eye. Tree is a movement because from seed to seed while soil and water exist it will be forever be heralded in time whenever wind brushes against its leaves. Thus it is safe to give a thing a name and to share that name since by a name is the kind of thing spoken about liked = good or un-liked = bad socially speaking. It is not good is the same as saying bad and it is bad when we do not know all the parts that form the whole is what I meant to say but forget to say in the above post. Luv peat P.S. Pick the flaws, dear friend, in my grammar? Luv PEaCe
Well then you deserve to be made fun of. After all you made the informed decision to buy a car that is "small and cute." It is as if you want other men to make fun of you. I mean to deny that products are not aimed at specific audiences is just crazy man. You do understand that you are targeted by adds all the time. I mean the proof in the pudding is that you think everyone should drive a hybrid and that anyone who doesn't make the decision is an uninformed idiot. Why should I drive it if I don't like the way it looks? It is kind of like drinking beer you don't like just to get drunk. Why not spend a little bit and get exactly what you want? It is your money. So you have never purchased an item based only on what you want? That is how you are acting. Do you buy things only from local store owners or do you stop and get things from somewhere because it is easy? Do you only buy earth friendly products? Do you live in a tree? Heck why do you even own a car? Why don't you just walk? If it is far away just buy a bike or a horse?
Different adjectives are used by different reviewers. This reminds me of the time when I didn't know which rattlesnake I liked more: the diamondback rattlesnake (eastern, I think it was), or the pygmy rattlesnake. The pygmy looked cooler than the diamondback, but it was called "pygmy", a word with rather negative connotations. The diamondback was so-named because it had diamond shapes on its back. What an amazing name, "diamondback". And so, as a child, I was conflicted. I knew which one I liked more, but I hated liking it because of, essentially, the scientific marketing toward the species (scientists name the species arbitrarily, essentially marketing the specie as how they themselves see it). Eventually I had an epiphany of sorts: the Universe doesn't give a shit what us monkeys name things; the pygmy could have been called "the ultimate rattlesnake of death" and the diamondback could have been called "weaksauce" and they still would be the same. A rose by any other name, indeed. And so I've come to become skilled at ignoring labels. The problem is its name. If a hybrid were called diesel-electric, it suddenly would be more marketable to men. I balance between owning what I want, what I can afford, and what is good. As gasoline is around 8.50 USD, owning a gas-guzzler here is only for the dumb-ass or the wealthy dumb-ass. Secondly, I don't own a car; truly, a bike and public transport can take me anywhere I need to go on the continent. Owning a car at this moment would be just a waste of money. In the event I need a car, I will then own and invest in a car. Until then, no need.
Famous last words Sayings of Jesus on the accursed stake. 1. Forgiveness, 2. Salvation, 3. Relationship, 4. Abandonment, 5. Distress, 6. Triumph and 7. Reunion Indirectly these words were interpreted from that which was recorded then transmitted if I am allowed to put those words into your mouth. It is safe to say that we here of this time who have gone through experience's historical ought be a little more aware of the threats the wills of our other's impose upon us. Science is natural philosophy with it's original project being to induce from the effects the causes in the domain of the world external to being. Metaphysics on the other hand works from the other direction in deducing from a cause what effect or outcome will be generated by being as a doing entity. That at least is the view as held from the Greek perspective as I read it. The Hebrews had no such notions nor needed them since they were in direct communion with the first cause of being with his legal case to present to the nations. The Greeks sought after wisdom, which is what philosophy is. Philia = love of association Sophos = wisdom. The Jews sought for a sign from heaven, with the CHRIST they received the sign of JONAH no more no less. The final words of the book of Jonah are significant. "Do you expect me to destroy a people who do not know their left hand from their right hand? Nineveh was a city filled with violence, apparently they repented and changed their ways, then FORGOT and destroyed their environment, both social and material in that Nineveh ceased to be and ended it's history with an anthropological, archaeological dig. Earth is no different today. If so called civilised society continues of it's present path sometime in the future the whole of the earth will go the way of NINEVEH as just another anthropological, archaeological dig for some alien race. Mankind lives because of the mercy of the father of Jesus, and each human who is intelligent enough to be aware knows they exist in a delicately balanced state between madness and genius as they walk the fine line between good and evil. In other words, Jesus famous last words could well be our own. Google this set of letters φιλοσοφία go to wiktionary find that love means friendly, beloved, wisdom means knowledge. Thus philosophy essentially means knowledge lover/sign lover. We are but little fish in a vast sea of quantum dynamical interference patterns. Luv Peat.
Jonah 4:11 Jonah 4:11 And should not I spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more then sixscore thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?
Not sure what "lolno" translates to. I worked in advanced materials in the early days of carbon fiber at Lockheed. Had samples of carbon fiber prototypes in my desk. One was a 2 inch by 2 inch "wide flange" beam 24 inches long. Flanges and web a little less than 1/8 inch thick. In one test we supported it at both ends and applied a 40,000 lb load in the middle. No significant deflection. It weighed less than a pack of cigarettes. As I said, almost unbelievable strength to weight. I wish I had paid more attention to chemistry. Took most of my life to recognize how important it is.
