Interview with TruthInArt

Would you prefer to be interviewed in poetry or prose?

Please, spare us the prose
Truthinart is all about
Real Poetry

Not poofy Haiku
that's Meaninglessness mostly
To the untrained eye!

Hurry truthinart
before interview begins
without you present

Prometry

I am not a poet for the metre is always wrong.
No Dactyls or Tractyls or Quadrilles do I show.
Regular rhythm structures from line to line no go.
My bleeding beating heart is irregular to say the least.
As for the rhyme at the end of the line well no go.
You are who you are and am what you am I show.
Me say hearsays not permitted in court is wrong.

Forget the meter
and use more color
so many tools
in poetry
this
that
and
the other

Enough Said More to DO!

Who is TIA What he say When do pay
Gramma Grampa Gram Game Gamut Game
Understand Comprehend Determine

Of weapons atonement with Father
Of sentence construction with the Son
Of willing in spirit intention

To Politics Commercial Religious
To Worship not that beast of burden
To knowledge that is pure in the light.

So when do you rock
When do you roll
Come on TIA Baby
Go man go

P.S. Bringing some DMX style up in this thread

TIA, I'm actually sort of interested in your view on the Bible, as it seems from your poetry that it diverges sharply from all the positions I was taught in my earlier years in parochial school. Perhaps you could give me some new perspective on the book itself that I didn't have before?

Edit: Also, ignore my possibly offensive posts in my other thread. I'm playing a character to see the results.

Knowledge that is pure in the light
belongs to who
how do we attain it?

in the game, as a function
in order to understand you
where do you stand?
what is your purpose?
who is your father?

In View of Terms

In to sight of the purchase is personal experience with trial by error?
In to eye of the price policy is personal experience with trial by terror?
In to purpose of the cost is personal experience with trial by horror?
In to reason of payment is personal experience with trial by mirror?

History in each entity is a personal de crypt ion of events that in act occur.
Mythology in each entity is a personal de crypt ion of lies held in the curse.
Memory in each entity is a personal de crypt ion of words said in discourse.
Truth in each entity is a personal de crypt ion of secrets held blind in abyss.

"There is no such thing as entertainment it is all education" in the movies.
Louis B. Maher Head of M.G.M. is asserted to of said to us improvises.
Intention of invention is for to inform the masses over horizons of verses.
Sentence constructions, words meanings of Gerunds that mean do devises.

Free will is free to act in co-operation with ones others brothers and sisters.
Father to Mother intercourse to sow seed work hard tough hands no blisters.

Ones standing are dependant upon ones relatives.
Trust in them and the description of terms so vital.
Bones of our ancestors lie rotting in graves natives.
Nerves of neural transmitters mirror that of rivals.

Sympathetic nervous systems see the red of blood.
Shocked by its spilling leaves bad tastes in our mouth.
Off like a terror bomb in a market bloody horror flood.
When learned a difference between North and South.

We are technically made of flesh and blood in vessels.
All from one source for nature is the act of creation.
Words meanings have been confused by poison cells.
Cancerous growths initiated by viruses’ evil intention.

Father to son sin inherited from Adam & Eve so deceitful.
YHWH to Jesus win merit of distinction war’s so conceitful.

there is a fine line
between enlightenment
and entertainment?

are bombs in markets
the offense
or payment
and answer back
or statement?

It's all stains.

Last evening while watching television.
My Daughter complained of my speech.
On “Neighbours” was tuning the station.
Died someone that she knew in her screech.

It’s story is that all-involving.
Tis in truth of history will intent.
It’s lessons in that alls revolving.
Decision tree of logic is kind tent.

Ones action is speaking words softly.
Argument principles out of love,
One winner one loser one's lofty,
The grinner is quiver of the dove.

A fine line is pleasure between pains.
Hamburglers buy meeting how it stains.

IMMANUEL

*** it-1 pp. 1187-1189 Immanuel ***

IMMANUEL

(Im·man´u·el) [With Us Is God].

A name first mentioned by the prophet Isaiah (7:14; 8:8) during the reign of Ahaz (761-746 B.C.E.). In Matthew 1:23, the only other occurrence, Immanuel is a name-title applied to Christ the Messiah.

In view of the circumstances under which the prophecy was given, Bible commentators have looked for an “Immanuel” in Isaiah’s day, one who fittingly served then as a sign that ‘God was with them.’ In that eighth century B.C.E., Pekah and Rezin, the kings of Israel and Syria, were bent on overthrowing Ahaz, king of Judah, in order to put the son of Tabeel upon his throne. (Isa 7:1-6) Jehovah, however, remembered his kingdom covenant with David, the forefather of Ahaz, and sent his prophet with this reassuring message:

“Listen, please, O house of David. . . . Jehovah himself will give you men a sign: Look! The maiden herself will actually become pregnant, and she is giving birth to a son, and she will certainly call his name Immanuel. Butter and honey he will eat by the time that he knows how to reject the bad and choose the good. For before the boy will know how to reject the bad and choose the good, the ground of whose two kings you are feeling a sickening dread will be left entirely.”—Isa 7:13-16.

Then, after telling about the birth of Isaiah’s second son, Maher-shalal-hash-baz, the prophecy next describes how the threat to Judah would be removed. As an irresistible flood, the Assyrians would completely inundate Syria and the northern kingdom of Israel, not stopping until they had dangerously spread over the land of Judah, even “to fill the breadth of your land, O Immanuel!” Then, in poetic grandeur, the prophet Isaiah warns all those in opposition to Jehovah: If you gird yourselves for war, if you plan out a scheme, if you speak a word against Jehovah—“it will not stand, for God is with us [Immanuel]!”—Isa 8:5-10.

Some have suggested that in the type back there “Immanuel” was a third son of Isaiah, perhaps by a Jewish maiden who may have become a second wife of the prophet. Certain Jewish commentators endeavored to apply the prophecy to the birth of Ahaz’ son Hezekiah. This, however, is ruled out, since the prophecy was uttered during Ahaz’ reign (Isa 7:1), making Hezekiah at least nine years old at the time.—2Ki 16:2; 18:1, 2.

Another possible candidate was Isaiah’s second son, mentioned in the next chapter, Maher-shalal-hash-baz, concerning whom it was said: “Before the boy will know how to call out, ‘My father!’ and ‘My mother!’ one will carry away the resources of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria before the king of Assyria.” (Isa 8:1-4) Certainly this echoes what was said about Immanuel: “Before the boy will know how to reject the bad and choose the good, the ground of whose two kings [of Damascus and Samaria] you are feeling a sickening dread will be left entirely.” (Isa 7:16) Also, the birth of Isaiah’s second son is presented in close connection with the further prophecy involving Immanuel and, as Immanuel was to be a “sign,” so also Isaiah said: “I and the children whom Jehovah has given me are as signs.”—Isa 7:14; 8:18.

The principal objection to this identification of Isaiah’s second son as the Immanuel of Ahaz’ day is on the grounds that Isaiah’s wife is spoken of as “the prophetess,” not as “the maiden,” as well as the fact that she was already the mother of Isaiah’s firstborn, Shear-jashub, hence no “maiden.” (Isa 7:3; 8:3) It may be noted, however, that the Hebrew word here translated “maiden” is not bethu·lah´, meaning, specifically, “virgin,” but is `al·mah´, having a broader reference to a young woman, who could be either a virgin maiden or a recently married woman. The singular `al·mah´ also occurs in six other texts, more than one of which involves a virgin maiden.—Ge 24:43 (compare vs 16); Ex 2:8; Ps 68:25; Pr 30:19; Ca 1:3; 6:8.

The full and complete identity of Immanuel, of course, is found in the office and personage of the Lord Jesus Christ. The use, therefore, of the Hebrew word `al·mah´ in the prophecy would accommodate both the type (if such was a young wife of Ahaz or of Isaiah) and the antitype (the betrothed and yet virgin Mary). In the case of Mary there was no question about her being a virgin when she became “pregnant by holy spirit,” both Matthew and Luke recording this historical fact. (Mt 1:18-25; Lu 1:30-35) “All this actually came about for that to be fulfilled which was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet,” Matthew observed. It was a sign that identified the long-awaited Messiah. So in keeping with these facts, Matthew’s Gospel (quoting Isa 7:14) uses the Greek word par·the´nos, meaning “virgin,” to translate `al·mah´, saying: “Look! The virgin [par·the´nos] will become pregnant and will give birth to a son, and they will call his name Immanuel.” (Mt 1:22, 23) In no way was this taking liberties or distorting the text. Over a century earlier, the Jewish translators of the Greek Septuagint had also used par·the´nos in rendering Isaiah 7:14.

This identity of Jesus Christ as Immanuel did not mean he was the incarnation of God, ‘God in the flesh,’ which proponents of the Trinity teaching claim is implied by the meaning of Immanuel, namely, “With Us Is God.” It was a common practice among Jews to embody the word “God,” even “Jehovah,” in Hebrew names. Even today Immanuel is the proper name of many men; none of whom are incarnations of God.

If there seems to be a conflict between the angel’s instructions to Mary (“you are to call his name Jesus”) and Isaiah’s prophecy (“she will certainly call his name Immanuel”), let it be remembered that Messiah was also to be called by yet other names. (Lu 1:31; Isa 7:14) For example, Isaiah 9:6 said concerning this one: “His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.” Yet none of these names were given to Mary’s firstborn as personal names, neither when he was a babe nor after he took up his ministry. Rather, they were all prophetic title-names by which Messiah would be identified. Jesus lived up to the meaning of these names in every respect, and that is the sense in which they were prophetically given, to show his qualities and the good offices he would perform toward all those accepting him as Messiah. So also with his title Immanuel. He measured up to and fulfilled its meaning.

Worshipers of Jehovah have always desired God to be with them, on their side, backing them up in their undertakings, and often he reassures them that he is, sometimes giving them visible signs to this effect. (Ge 28:10-20; Ex 3:12; Jos 1:5, 9; 5:13–6:2; Ps 46:5-7; Jer 1:19) If today the personal identity of Immanuel in the days of Ahaz remains uncertain, it may be that Jehovah so directed in order not to distract the attention of later generations from the Greater Immanuel, when he put in his appearance as a sign from heaven. With the coming of his beloved Son to earth as the promised Messianic “seed” (Ge 3:15) and rightful heir to the throne of David, Jehovah was furnishing his greatest sign that he had not forsaken mankind or his Kingdom covenant. The title-name Immanuel, therefore, was particularly appropriate to Christ, for his presence was indeed a sign from heaven. And with this foremost representative of Jehovah among mankind, Matthew under inspiration could truly say, “With Us Is God.”

Loving Kindness

Kinship to a sailor on a sea is actions revival.
Operate with other ones sailing in cruel seas save our ship.
Relations ship intents of kindness will companions survival.
Communication to each member of the earth our star ship.

Characters operates meditates calculates remembers.
Will power is driving all of us to the ends beginnings.
Come from where, from where come, where we go what we wear is embers.
From atoms supernova explosions spiritual are beings.

Fashions come fascists go faces glow tyranny ends smile faces.
Agreement reached for one belief in colour of rainbow.
Sinners lose, the cowards, ones hating what is good, their disgraces.
Children first women help men behind as Captain heads ships bow.

Conscience needs good training kind coaching tough practice in manners.
Listening is wanting to hear to remember a simple list matters.

What seperates a sinner and a saint, truthinart? Is it really thier cosmological stance on Jesus's divinity, or thier actions as altruistic and giving individuals towards thier community?

zink breaks formation
life without mistakes
no thanks
forgiven

we will not
make him walk
the planck

or will we?

There is no form
There is no poem
All there is is human
and nothing more

Try to write a poem to save the starving
Try to write one to help the blind see
All it does, in the end, is confirm emotion
It does not bring anything helpful to me

So, type your words
make your artistic stand
but in the end-
Is it me who is breaking?
Is it me who does not understand?

lollygagging logic lulls me like a lullaby
some sweet satire seems lovely
a nice little twist

intuitive understanding is both
a vision and voice
if you see so
speak it

Don't just speak it- act it out.

Sometimes release is better than self containment.

Let your hands follow your mind, rather than leaving them idle.

Homelessness

As I see it is not necessarily the way you see it.
We each come from separate lists of experiences.
Those experiences are what makes each one special.
Attitude to the trial by terror is vital for species survival.

At present my mind is seeking to comprehend reasons fro emotions.
Natural Law is to my mind that which drives us all to be reasonable.
We agree almost universally taht two plus two is four which equates to freedom.
Freedom in the sense that only a fool would ever ever ever disagree with fact.

So at present I am busy studying emotions within my self and others in this test.
I so far have noticed that with a valid reason comes a belief that can be trusted.
When ones trusts that a belief is true that produces wholesale faith in a fact.
The interfaith movements of the christian churches are all seeking the same objective.

However saboteurs have crept into the churches and are misleading many in the flock.
If they were truly men of good will to God they would not vote for political parties.
The beastlike figures of Daniel and Revelation are political entities beastly taxes.
Commerce is dependant upon them to regulate the environment when its international trade.

The vast majority of the people who do the work live on little more than subsistence wages.
The rich get more while the poor get poorer in fact they are kept powerless by ignorance.
Property rights can only be gained by working and then going into a debit account.
This is why the majority of people continue to work so hard to get out of debt.

Sad but true and just why it is so and just why people put up with it mystifies me.
I look forward to the fall of babylon the great and the revelation of the secrets.
She is a mystery says the Bible and I look forward to seeing the merchants wail and cry.
Her fall is immanent the great harlot who made herself rich and her merchants rich.


But failed to look after the poor and the suffering and left the homeless without shelter.