sand in the eyes Bullying has many forms from verbal to physical to simply ignoring a person. MEN who IGNORE the CREATOR of them have turned into that KIND OF TERRORIST. I.E. I had a choice when I visited university to write in the accepted academic style. I don't know how many academic theses you have read but note please they are DRY. One of Uncles said the best way to graduate is find out the politics of the lecturer. Then write all essays biased toward their politics which is a method for SUCCESS. In other words to COMPROMISE PERSONAL INTEGRITY for the SAKE OF PEACE. The POINT IS WHO KIDNAPPED MANKIND? WHO HELD THEM UP FOR RANSOM? WAS IT YHWH he was the one who let ADAM AND EVE of the HOOK to find the CONSEQUENCE OF ACTIONS? The ACCUSER is the one who holds us UP and the BLOOD of the CHRIST is used EVERY DAY. Have you not noticed the violence and BLOODSHED on EARTH EVERY SINGLE DAY? As for the answer and being forced into a corner and having to answer 5 cos you say so! You are a BULLY as soon as you do that and LIKE ZENO I would bite my tongue off and spit it at you. You the KING, PRESIDENT of your future just another FASCIST NIHILISTIC ANARCHIST BULLY. Just to ask that question who is in the SHIT NOT ME. Who would want to talk to YOU anyway with your.... double standards double tongue putting men and women into a double BIND? YOUR EVIL NOT ME! @#%$ BULLY! PEAT EATS TOO
You forget, TruthInAct, that it is you who began the bullying by called me a coward. I think your definition of a coward and bully is anyone who calls you names after you call them names. And when things don't go your way, you conveniently forget that you started it. What do you think? Forget the first word of that last sentence.
No. I proved that you are--or will make--a bad parent because you answered "four." You hold such blind loyalty to such meaningless truths as 2x2=4, that you would encourage your children to die for such a petty cause. That's called dysfunctional thinking. Don't you think?
Powers that be And the POWERS that BE have the right to extract from your income whatever they decide you can be left with as a LIVING. Democracy and the vow people pay are also a good example of dysfunctional thinking. Fictitious case scenarios and POWER PLAYS where men assert their rights over others. That is why I went OFF not at YOU but all THE EWES led like sheep to the slaughter. Sophie's Choice and other such case scenarios are POWER PLAYS and about instances where POWER IS ABUSED. That put people in a position of compromise where they are forced into a corner to choose the lesser of two evils. The YOU I was screaming at on writing that angry piece was the YOU in ALL OF US which includes ME. Everybody when they sign the birth certificate is signing their child in for a life of servitude to that STATE. All parents sign and know they have no choice but to SURVIVE the times and PRAY they arrive alive in the KINGDOM OF GOD. Axiom of CHOICE owns a similar History. Here is a brief chronology of AC:[6] 1904/1908Zermelo introduces axioms of set theory, explicitly formulates AC and uses it to prove the well-ordering theorem, thereby raising a storm of controversy.1904Russell recognizes AC as the multiplicative axiom: the product of arbitrary nonzero cardinal numbers is nonzero.1914Hausdorff derives from AC the existence of nonmeasurable sets in the “paradoxical” form that ½ of a sphere is congruent to 1/3 of it (Hausdorff 1914).1922Fraenkel introduces the “permutation method” to establish independence of AC from a system of set theory with atoms (Fraenkel 1922).1924Building on the work of Hausdorff, Banach and Tarski derive from AC their paradoxical decompositions of the sphere.1926Hilbert introduces into his proof theory the “transfinite” or “epsilon” axiom as a version of AC . (Hilbert 1926).1936Lindenbaum and Mostowski extend and refine Fraenkel's permutation method, and prove the independence of various statements of set theory weaker than AC . (Lindenbaum and Tarski 1938) 1935–38Gödel establishes relative consistency of AC with the axioms of set theory (Gödel 1938, 1939, 1940). 1950sMendelson, Shoenfield and Specker, working independently, use the permutation method to establish the independence of various forms of AC from a system of set theory without atoms, but also lacking the axiom of foundation (Mendelson 1956, 1958, Shoenfield 1955, Specker 1957).1963Paul Cohen proves independence of AC from the standard axioms of set theory (Cohen 1963, 1963a, 1964). The BATTLE CONTINUES. Peter
Wisdom is relative. IQ should be more objective, all things being equal. When all things are not equal, wise people keep it to themselves.
A MAZE ING Frostcloud = The only place on the planet where 2+2=5 and 2x2=5 and 2^2=5? Where if you do not agree with that premise you can get KILLED OFF. That is REMOVED from the FORUM and NO FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE ENTERED INTO? Thank GOD that is NOT TRUE. Peter
